In a Perfect World
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204083846
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-PF 2022
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8334444279
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $347,735
- Expenses
- $451,762
- Assets
- $2,783,694
- Liabilities
- $20,768
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- MANUELA TESTOLINI (FOUNDER/PRES): $96,320 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We empower young people with the tools, skills, and opportunities they need to succeed and thrive. Iapw programs improve academic outcomes, develop critical life skills, and unlock the potential of youth to lead transformational change.
What it reported doing in 2024
Love 4 one another: love 4 one another (l4oa) was established by iapw to honor and build upon the philanthropic work between iapw founder, manuela testolini and music icon, prince. Through l4oa, we harness the power of music, art, and technology to empower young people in under-resourced schools and communities. By providing musical instruments, music therapy interventions, and multimedia tools, we promote well-being and give kids the chance to strengthen their academics and have their voices heard. In 2023, we opened a new music & multimedia lab and teen empowerment center in southeast d.c.. The space hosts our dreamcatchers and youth ambassadors programs and provides access to technology and music for 600 students from one of the most economically disadvantaged and underserved communities in the country. In 2024, we launched goodtech, a forward-thinking program created to empower the next generation of changemakers. In todays fast-paced digital landscape, its more important than ever for young people to stay connected and use their voices for good. Goodtech blends digital literacy, civic engagement, and social-emotional learning into a dynamic curriculum that builds essential 21st-century leadership skills. Through hands-on projects and creative exploration, students discover how technology, art, music, and podcasting can be harnessed as powerful tools for advocacy, storytelling, and lasting social impact.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.16; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.3%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $328K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.