Improved Order of Red Men of Texas

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

9 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

To provide support for other charitable organizations, especially those that support youth

To provide recreational, educational, and physical training to children

Revenue model: No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -152.3%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: -8.3% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.