Imperial Valley LGBT Resource Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473799558
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- El Centro, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7605924066
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Lesbian, Gay Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $639,798
- Expenses
- $599,771
- Assets
- $719,366
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROSA DIAZ (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
People named in this filing
- ROSA DIAZ (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- VINCENT POLLIZZI (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER)
- AGUSTINA SNYDER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of this corporation is to provide charitable and educational programs that promote health & well-being for all individuals, including LGBTQ+ community members & allies. We are dedicated to serving everyone through compassionate care and comprehensive support services.
What it reported doing in 2024
California Workplace Outreach Project (CWOP). During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Center played a critical role in protecting Imperial Countys workforce through the California Workplace Outreach Project (CWOP). Through this initiative, the Center provided COVID-19 education, prevention guidance, and essential resource information to approximately 55% of all workers in Imperial County. Our efforts focused on increasing awareness of workplace health and safety protections, including labor laws related to hazard prevention, reporting rights, and access to support services. The Center conducted extensive outreach to both workers and employers in sectors with elevated exposure risks, ensuring they had the tools and knowledge needed to prevent workplace transmission. Outreach activities prioritized farmworkers and agricultural packing facilities, but also reached employees in food service, manufacturing, logistics, warehousing, and janitorial industries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 81% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 35
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.5%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 65.6%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.3%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.5% of revenue deployed · 65.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $394K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.