Impact Volleyball Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814150793
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Oshkosh, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9204272329
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $190,426
- Expenses
- $159,108
- Assets
- $110,306
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TODD MATTES (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KATRINA COSTELLO (VICE PRESIDE): $4,650 total reported compensation
- CHRIS COMPEAN (TREASURER): $3,200 total reported compensation
- TODD MATTES (PRESIDENT): $1,200 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Impact volleyball club was created to provide a fun and highly competitive form of club volleyball to its members. Impact vbc provides its members with advanced skills training and tactical instruction in a positive, competitive learning environment. Through our training members will learn the basic fundamentals and current techniques of volleyball, as well as more advanced strategies to become more successful, more confident, and highly skilled overall volleyball players. We hope to provide a safe and fun environment that fosters growth as an athlete, a teammate, a citizen and a lifelong love for the sport of volleyball.
What it reported doing in 2019
Offer a youth volleyball league to combat community deterioration and juvenile delinquency by fostering amateur sports competition for the comunity and underprivileged youth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 34.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 50.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.7% of revenue deployed · 93.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $149K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.