Impact Thrift Stores Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 233080883
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Souderton, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2673870030
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Thrift Shops
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,673,989
- Expenses
- $11,349,702
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GRAY WIRTH (PRESIDENT &)
- GRAY WIRTH (FORMER CEO)
- JAMES JONES (ACTING CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- GRAY WIRTH (FORMER CEO): $144,437 total reported compensation
- SUSAN BARANOWSKI (CAO): $97,464 total reported compensation
- JAMES JONES (CFO AND TREA): $77,417 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Financially support local charities helping families and children in need through the net proceeds generated by our thrift store operations. Our financial support of these local non-profits enables their staff to spend more time doing what they do best - feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, and supporting children and families in need. Impact thrift repurposes donations of gently used merchandise by selling items that are no longer needed to those who put them back in service. Because more than 90% of the inventory in our stores is from donated merchandise, our success depends on a community effort. Together we make a difference. We make an impact as a faith-based, non-profit organization, we: -- seek to honor god and value people in all we do. -- financially support locally based charities providing hunger and homelessness prevention; early childhood, adolescent and adult education; family dental care; and foster care and adoption services. -- provide access to low-cost, high-qua
What it reported doing in 2016
Financially support local charities through the net proceeds generated by their thrift store operations and provide quality merchandise at affordable prices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 62
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $146.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -27.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $144K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.