Impact Sante Social Action Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991406602
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Olathe, KS, USA
Phone
9136364275
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$94,609
Expenses
$13,512
Assets
$81,097
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • L BERNARD BLEDSOE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL SHELTON (MEMBER)
  • REGINA FOARD (MEMBER)
  • ANTHONY MARKLEY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Impact: sante social action (issa) is a faith-based, nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being of underserved communities through community health education (che), humanitarian aid, and development initiatives. Issa empowers local churches and communities to address health, education, and economic challenges by implementing sustainable, grassroots programs rooted in biblical values.our mission is carried out through village-based and urban che projects, support for displaced families, youth empowerment, microenterprise training for women, and disaster relief. Issa operates in areas affected by conflict, persecution, and political instability, providing holistic care while promoting dignity, resilience, and transformation.

What it reported doing in 2024

Koira t gui, rural che, makalondi, balleyera, filingue, women's groups, che training, displacement due to persecution, boankada project, urban & rural che visitsfor che committee gatherings, filingue, koira t gui, gardening awareness, outreach

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 85.7%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.