Impact Personal Safety
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850475597
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Santa Fe, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5059928833
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protection Against Abuse
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $410,957
- Expenses
- $496,777
- Assets
- $262,100
- Liabilities
- $37,467
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL THOMPSON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ALENA SCHAIM (EXECUTIVE DI): $89,377 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Grow the number of people in New Mexico who act to prevent violence in our communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other violence prevention programs for youth: we work with youth organizations such as girls inc. Of santa fe and the santa fe teen center to provide skill- based violence prevention classes. These classes address many aspects of violence prevention, including healthy relationships, the roots of violence, anti-bias/anti-bullying, verbal and physical boundary- setting, de-escalation and self-defense. In an already supportive environment, such as group or community organization, children and teens are more likely to disclose any problems they are having at home, as well as explore new behaviors that could prove beneficial to them in the future. 21 participants in 2024. Other violence prevention programs for adults: we know that it is critical to work not only with youth but also adults to ensure that the skills and attitudes that the youth learn are enforced and supported by the adults in their lives. We work with teachers, school staff, parents, conference attendees, and service providers to help create a community that promotes safety as an important value. These classes and programs address many aspects of violence prevention, including healthy relationships, protecting young children, approaches to violence prevention, the roots of violence, anti-bias/anti-bullying, verbal and physical boundary-setting, de-escalation, and self-defense. We also present at events, conferences, schools, provider meetings, and coalition meetings. 428 participants in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.9% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $386K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.