Impact Futures
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680643249
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Amarillo, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8063507623
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,968
- Expenses
- $124,420
- Assets
- $8,605
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- SONJI WILHELM (CHAIR)
- RHONDA SHERWOOD (SECRETARY)
- ANNE JONES (EXECUTIVE BO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide awareness and leadership toward continuing education of professionals and community members regarding substance abuse prevention, intervention, and treatment. To strengthen existing organizations that contribute to a healthy enviornment for youth. To encourage the establishment of new organizations to fill gaps in programs and services. To assist organizations to coordinate existing resources and assets to identify and prioritize community issues and develop coalition action plans. To ensure a healthier community by building assets, stregthening protective factors and reducing risk factors in the community.
What it reported doing in 2015
Coordinating coalition membership, administering contracted services, coordinating activities, evaluating future needs and strategies, coordinating town hall meetings, promoting alcohol awareness month and powertalk 21 as well as informing the public about dangerous synthetic drugs such as k2
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.1%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 60%; rating input score 60
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -40.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.1% of revenue deployed · 60% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $75K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.