Impact Charitable

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471180598
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
7203176002
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,478,571
Expenses
$16,318,163
Assets
$40,740,314
Liabilities
$22,799,403

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICH HOOPS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • EDWARD BRISCOE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • CINDY WILLARD (SENIOR DIR. OF CAPITAL ACTIVATION): $153,160 total reported compensation
  • JOURDAN MCGINN (SENIOR DIR. OF ECONOMIC MOBILITY): $143,071 total reported compensation
  • HANNAH DEALTO (CONTROLLER): $126,981 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Impact charitable unites catalytic philanthropists with community partners, financial institutions, foundations, social enterprises, and governmental bodies. As an impact capital catalyst, impact charitable unlocks and accelerates capital that sparks positive change. We move more money, in more ways, to more people and places.

What it reported doing in 2024

Capital activation - at impact charitable, we move more money, in more ways, to more people and places by focusing on impact-first investing. Our primary objective is to drive meaningful impact, balancing financial return and risk in service of this mission. While we anticipate financial returns from our funds, our true measure of success lies in the impact and outcomes of these investments.impact charitable works through integrated capital, providing both grants and investments, to catalyze positive change. We collaborate with investors who understand that traditional approaches alone are insufficient to achieve the just and equitable outcomes we seek. Our team, with deep expertise in both philanthropy and finance, works to move money directly into impactful organizations, making lasting change possible.our approach ensures that a significant portion of the funds under our management is actively working in communities, driving positive social change. Throughout the year, impact charitable facilitated the movement of significant capital through a variety of impactful programs and services including direct investments, program-related investments, philanthropic investment funds, and donor-advised funds. Through these services, impact charitable facilitated the movement of $7,340,176 of investments and 7,517,022 of grant funds in 2024. Our key areas of focus include supporting economic mobility, financial inclusion, ownership economy, and affordable housing among other impact themes. By leveraging catalytic capital, we are able to facilitate access to opportunities for historically marginalized communities and help close the capital gaps that persist in traditional financial systems.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 63% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 61
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.6%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: $116.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.8%; rating input score 99; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33.3%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.5; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 32.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 33.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 37.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.6% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $15.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $153K · 13 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $355K reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 53 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 47 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.