Impact America Inc Dba Lion's Den Dfw
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843552260
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2147554734
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $189,284
- Expenses
- $312,304
- Assets
- $14,001
- Liabilities
- $6,955
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- R EDWIN PEARCE (PRESIDENT, CEO)
People named in this filing
- R EDWIN PEARCE (PRESIDENT, CEO)
- DOUG WILLIAMSON (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS)
- KURT KNAPTON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The lion's den dfw was created to fuel the expansion of the kingdom economy through investing in transformative entrepreneurship. Through our yearly conference and pitch competition, we connect and equip business leaders to use their wealth and experience to change the world and create a tremendous impact. Our goal is to facilitate value-aligned investments by connecting christ-centered entrepreneurs with investors.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization hosts an annual conference and pitch competition each year in the spring connecting christian entrepreneurs with like-minded christian business investors. In 2024, a total of 819 people registered and attended the conference.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 5
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.2%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 28.6%; rating input score 29
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -65%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 98.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -59.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.2% of revenue deployed · 28.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.