Impact 100 East Bay Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813431763
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Livermore, CA, USA
Phone
9252322021
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$533,415
Expenses
$397,247
Assets
$711,556
Liabilities
$457,376

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Denise Coyne (President)
  • Wende Amerie (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Denise Coyne (President)
  • Wende Amerie (Vice President)
  • Sylvia Inchausti (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Impact 100 East Bay is a women's collective giving and grant-making organization which awards alameda and contra costa county non-profit groups with funds for transformational, innovative and impactful programs to address community needs that are often delayed or underserved.

What it reported doing in 2025

Since 2017, Impact 100 East Bay has provided over $1,400,000 in grants to local non-profits to fund transformational projects in Alameda and Contra Costa County. The grants fund programs to provide: Mental Health Service to youth and young adults in Foster care (CASA) and homeless (Covenant House), Education support in underserved communities - Literacy Mentoring(Aspire) and Science education (Community Resources for Science), Programs to address Food Insecurity through White Pony Express, Meals on Wheels Diablo and the CCC Food Insecurity Collaborative, Support survivors (Victims) thru ProBono legal support (Justice at Last), Job training for Trafficking victims (Missey) and Financial Literacy (Narika), West Contra costa Small Business recovery during COVID (Renaissance Entrepreneurship), Provide pro-bono dental services for East CCC (Dentist on Wheels), Provide additional support to at risk students including roadmap to college and trade school (Opportunity Junction) and Robotics career exposure (Biotech Partners). During 2025, $331,000 in grants were awarded to local non-profits: Planting Justice - food truck program, Child Advocates of CCC - expansion of foster youth tutoring program, Hack the Hood - expanding technology training program for High School students into Artificial Intelligence (AI), Opportunity Junction - expand career coaching to graduates of their administrative career program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 92% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 95.1%; rating input score 95; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.5%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.79; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $382K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.