Immaculate Heart of Mary Family Health C

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843681269
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Chandler, AZ, USA
Phone
4806652450
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$651,917
Expenses
$606,269
Assets
$9,140
Liabilities
$57,425

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Charles Armstrong (President)
  • Annie Santoro (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Charles Armstrong (President): $83,833 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Offer excellent primary care services to people of all socioeconomic backgrounds that is wholly consistent with the ethical and religious directives of the catholic church.

What it reported doing in 2024

Immaculate Heart of Mary Family Health Center is a non-profit charitable primary care clinic in Chandler, AZ. Our mission is to provide excellent primary care services to people of all socioeconomic backgrounds in a way that is wholly consistent with the Ethical and Religious Directives of the Catholic Church ERDs. We are committed to providing medical care to everyone, including the poor and underserved in our community, in a way that reflects the love and mercy that God has for all of our patients. We provide care to the poor and underserved by providing a sliding fee scale payment system that allows people living under 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Level to receive greatly discounted appointment fees, procedure fees, as well as discounted in-office testing and medications. We also participate in the Vaccine for Children VFC program which allows us to distribute free immunizations to the underserved pediatric patients in our state. We do not deny care to anyone because of inability to pay, we do not limit the number of patients who participate in our sliding fee scale, nor the number of Medicare or Medicaid patients that we care for. We will never limit charitable visits or charity-care patients. In 2024 we were able to significantly increase access to Christ-centered primary care in our community by providing 70 immunizations as part of the VFC program. We provided 38 very low income sliding fee scale appointments, 128 Medicaid visits and 720 Medicare visits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 65
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.1%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.28; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 48.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.1% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $574K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.