Imahelps Ecuador

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991406963
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Sioux Falls, SD, USA
Phone
7608982786
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$85,230
Expenses
$73,841
Assets
$20,030

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ines Allen (President)
  • Nina K Maw Maw MD (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ines Allen (President)
  • Nina K Maw Maw MD (Vice President)
  • Tracey D Allen (Secretary/Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide humanitarian medical, dental, and surgical services to underserved populations in Ecuador through volunteer-based medical missions.

What it reported doing in 2025

IMAHELPS ECUADOR conducted a humanitarian medical and dental mission in Cayambe, Ecuador, providing free medical, dental, and pain management services to underserved populations. During the mission, 2,506 clinical services were delivered, including 457 general/internal medicine visits, 364 pediatric consultations, 331 gynecology and obstetrics services, 109 emergency consultations, 811 pain management treatments, and 434 dental procedures. A total of 986 prescriptions were dispensed. Approximately 66.7% of patients served were women, and the most represented age group was 3154 years (36.2%). Services included preventive care, chronic disease management, dental restorations, and medication distribution to individuals lacking regular access to healthcare. Patients requiring additional monitoring or post-procedure evaluation were referred for follow-up care coordinated through local medical providers to ensure continuity of treatment after the mission concluded.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.4%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $74K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.