Imahe

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455182120
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Tacoma, WA, USA
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Dance

Reported finances

Revenue
$85,175
Expenses
$47,817
Assets
$179,641

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Crystal Kadekawa (President)
  • Amanda Abrenilla (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Crystal Kadekawa (President)
  • Amanda Abrenilla (Vice President)
  • Sarah Chargalauf (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Imahes goal is to educate the general public about the Chamorro people the traditional customs and inafamaolek. Besides having regularly scheduled classes we strive to help perpetuate the rich culture of the Chamorro people through stage productions held for the general public throughout the year including educational workshops performances and other cultural events.

What it reported doing in 2024

Various Cultural Performances Ethnic Performances Pierce County School Cultural Collaboration Cultural Workshop Tacoma Urban League Collaboration were performed in 2024. Audience attendance varies with each event.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.8%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 43.9%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.76; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 27.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.8% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.