Imagine New Mexico

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991547472
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Santa Fe, NM, USA
Phone
5056292060
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Coalitions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$96,738
Expenses
$79,438
Assets
$45,821

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVEN K MOISE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEVEN K MOISE (PRESIDENT)
  • MARK S BENAK (VP/SECRETARY)
  • NOTAH R BEGAY III (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Imagine New Mexico will enhance the lives of new mexicans by incentivizing collaboration among non-profit organizations to achieve measurable improvements in the following areas: education, healthcare, poverty, economy and crime. Establish data platforms and benchmarks to measure progress in these areas and share best ideas with other non-profit organizations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Imagine New Mexico's (inm) initiative is multi-faceted and long-term. The first stage is to create a data dashboard to track key indicators in the focus area. Inm's initial focus area is healthcare. This data dashboard will be available to the public and other relevant stakeholders like government agencies and non-profits. Inm will use the data to facilitate collaboration among certain non-profits working in each focus area and will provide financial incentives and rewards to those non-profits that demonstrate quantifiable success through their collaboration.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 72

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.4% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.7% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 46.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59% of revenue deployed · 71.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.