Illinois Select Fastpitch Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852204405
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Shorewood, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7082804433
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,630
- Expenses
- $22,749
- Assets
- $38,881
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dan Exstrom (President)
People named in this filing
- Dan Exstrom (President)
- Kevin Nahs (Treasurer)
- Ken Klonicki (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Illinois Select Fastpitch, Inc. is a nonprofit organization fostering, encouraging, and promoting the participation of children in softball for educational, competitive, and recreational purposes throughout Illinois. We provide a positive, nurturing, and safe environment in which our players can learn an appreciation for sportsmanship, self-esteem, pride, and integrity while developing life skills and personal character through the enjoyment of the softball. Our primary focus has been on developing a softball league for youth of all backgrounds to develop and skills and experience an elite level of softball. We provide year-round experiences for girls that include indoor and outdoor training, skills clinics with local professional instructors and college coaches, and league volunteers.
What it reported doing in 2020
Sucessfully created a leauge of 6 teams in 2020. We helped the local youth develop sills through our training and skills clinics. We also succesfully assist our high school level participants in their college recruiting efforts. Program expenses went towards cost of equipment, uniforms, game fees, and facility rental.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.9%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 63.1%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.