Illinois Osteopathic Medical Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 366065503
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3122911965
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $24,858
- Expenses
- $43,655
- Assets
- $252,144
- Liabilities
- $290
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELIZABETH HARANO CHCP (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KIM HUNTINGTON-ALFANO DO (PRESIDENT)
- RALPH NAFTALY DO (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NIKHIL BHARGAVA DO (TRUSTEE)
- NARESH CHANDAN DO (TRUSTEE)
- MATTHEW HARRISON DO (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To act as a non-profit professional body in the interest and for the benefit of its members on matters of membership, legislation, and public relations for the purpose of creating and maintaining high professional and ethical standards for the osteopathic profession in the state of Illinois and for the mutual benefit of the individual members and the public they serve.
What it reported doing in 2023
-provided continuing medical education across the state of Illinois to help members meet career goals.-monitored legislation important to the osteopathic medical community. Volunteered medical expertise to state panels. Met with legislators to share the physician perspective on health care policy issues. -provided professional support through the Illinois insights newsletter and the maintenance of web resources. -represented our membership to various government and professional organizations. -supported postgraduates in training and nwe physicians in practice through our website, awards, seminars, and meetings. -supported osteopathic medical students through student workshops and awards.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -75.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.78; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 52.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.