Illinois Mentoring Partnership

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461694138
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
3128817766
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Child Matching Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,641
Expenses
$30,656
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNA-CLAIRE SETTERLIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THROUGH 4/20)
  • DAVID SHAPIRO (PRESIDENT & ED AS OF 4/20)

People named in this filing

  • ROBIN MELVIN (CO-CHAIR THROUGH 4/27/20)
  • JUSTIN JOHNSON (CO-CHAIR THROUGH 4/27/20)
  • ANNA-CLAIRE SETTERLIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THROUGH 4/20)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Imp mentors youth in il, serving more than 400 emerging programs & impacting over 55,000.

What it reported doing in 2020

Imp (dba mentor Illinois) is the statewide champion and resource for quality youth mentoring in Illinois, serving more than 400 emerging and establised programs and impacting more than 55,000 youth by providing resources, training and technical assistance to build capacity, as well as creating heightened public awareness to drive additional engagement in youth mentoring as an effective investment in positive youth development and workforce readiness.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 4
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -218%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 70.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -33.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -31.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.