Illinois Knights Templar Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
370724685
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019
Location
Glen Ellyn, IL, USA
Phone
6308585550
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nursing Services (General)

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,563,228
Expenses
$237,278
Assets
$7,527,674
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM J FARRIS (PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREW MICHYETA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM J FARRIS (PRESIDENT)
  • AUSTON E SMITH (SECRETARY)
  • JOHN SANSONE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Illinois knights templar home supports the Illinois masonic outreach services which provides assistance and dispenses charity to needy master masons, their spouses, widows, mothers, children and other proper objects of masonic charity.

What it reported doing in 2019

1. Support of Illinois masonic outreach services (imos) which provides assistance and dispenses charity to needy master masons, their spouses, widows, mothers, children, and other proper objects of masonic charity.2. The forty mile project: send representatives from each individual commandry to nursing homes to assist residents with an application for charity. After the application process is complete, charitable grants are awarded to knights templar, their families, and others.3. Provide charitable assistance to residents of our previously-owned home.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 24
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 96
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 14.6%; rating input score 15
  • Program expense ratio: 45.9%; rating input score 46
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 64.2%; rating input score 64; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 84.8%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 31.73; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -32.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 14.6% of revenue deployed · 45.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $109K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 23 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.