Illinois Elks Children's Care Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371238064
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Chatham, IL, USA
- Phone
- 2174833020
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $687,747
- Expenses
- $562,477
- Assets
- $8,711,720
- Liabilities
- $31,050
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
People named in this filing
- JIM GOLDSBOROUGH (VICE-CHAIRMAN)
- TAWN WILLIAMS (CHAIRMAN)
- CHAD MITSDARFFER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organized to provide medical aid, medical research and medical education for persons up to age 21, in the state of Illinois, and to provide scholarships for individuals seeking education in physical and occupational therapy.
What it reported doing in 2025
Children's care medical benefits - the corporation offers diagnosis and treatment of certain medical maladies, of Illinois children, of any race, color or creed. All referrals to the organization are condsidered, with benefits flowing to those qualified based on medical and financial review.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.6%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 65.7%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.2%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.49; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.6% of revenue deployed · 65.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $370K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.