Illinois Center for Employee Ownership
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920777460
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Oakbrook Terrace, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3123500623
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $124,852
- Expenses
- $81,089
- Assets
- $87,992
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Haydee Caldero (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Haydee Caldero (Executive Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Illinois Center for Employee Ownership is the state's leading resource for education, guidance and support on employee ownership.
What it reported doing in 2025
ILCEO made substantial progress toward the goals outlined in the EOX Capacity Grant proposal by strengthening organizational infrastructure, expanding outreach, and increasing stakeholder engagement around employee ownership in Illinois. Key operational goals were successfully completed, including implementation of a CRM system, QuickBooks, donor processing tools, and a redesigned website integrated with outreach and automation systems. These improvements enhanced organizational planning, donor engagement, communications, and long-term sustainability. ILCEO also expanded its board by six members and began developing a formal onboarding process to strengthen leadership capacity. The organization participated in four major business conferences and 12 partner events, increasing awareness of employee ownership and reaching more than 750 participants through presentations and marketing efforts. Fundraising and development efforts included submission of 18 grant applications and direct outreach to major foundations, including the McCormick Foundation, Chicago Community Trust, and MacArthur Foundation. While grants were not awarded during the reporting period, ILCEO significantly expanded its fundraising infrastructure and relationships with philanthropic partners. The organization also launched structured donor outreach campaigns, growing its email list to more than 1,000 contacts and achieving email open rates above 40 percent. Government and policy engagement exceeded expectations. ILCEO met with the Governor's Office, Chicago City Council members, Cook County leadership, and more than 12 Illinois legislators to discuss employee ownership policy initiatives and public Offices of Employee Ownership. The organization also participated in Advocacy Day in Springfield and introduced employee ownership office legislation at the city level. ILCEO hosted its annual employee ownership celebration event with nearly 60 RSVPs from business owners, advisors, ecosystem partners, and community stakeholders. The event generated sponsorship and partnership opportunities while strengthening public visibility. Several goals were modified due to staffing and funding limitations. The Program Assistant position was reduced from full-time to part-time support, the public advocacy committee shifted to informal government engagement, and the planned employee ownership promotional video was not completed. Large-scale database development efforts were also scaled back to prioritize operational infrastructure and fundraising capacity. Despite these adjustments, ILCEO established a strong operational and fundraising foundation for future growth. Major accomplishments included CRM implementation, board expansion, public policy engagement, grant development, and expanded awareness of employee ownership throughout Illinois.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.7%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 67.2%; rating input score 67
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.7% of revenue deployed · 67.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.