Illinois Campus Compact Co National Louis University

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300408781
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
7736829746
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$4,013
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CAMILLE WILLIAMSON (BOARD MEMBER)
  • TERESA AMOTT (BOARD CHAIR)
  • TROY HAMMOND (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Illinois campus compact is a nonprofit membership organization that is a coalition of Illinois college and university presidents and their campuses working to promote the public purposes of higher education. As the only statewide organization dedicated to advancing higher education's civic mission, Illinois campus compact provides leadership in advocating for and supporting programs, partnerships, and initiatives that build civic engagement and renewal into campus and academic life.

What it reported doing in 2019

Illinois Campus Compact is a membership organization that is a coalition of Illinois college and university presidents and their respective educational institutions working to promote the public purposes of higher education. Members bond together to actively engage university presidents, faculty, staff, and students in promoting a vision of higher education that includes civic and community development. As the only statewide organization dedicated to advancing higher education's civic mission, Illinois Campus Compact provides leadership in advocating for and supporting programs, partnerships, and initiatives that build civic engagement and renewal into campus and academic life.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.