Ignition Community Glass
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464604282
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3124652389
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,070
- Expenses
- $174,112
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICIA KAHL ATHA (President)
People named in this filing
- PATRICIA KAHL ATHA (President)
- ALPHONSE GRAY (Treasurer)
- ANDREA VAUGHN (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Leverage the transformative power of the arts to enhance social-emotional wellbeing, classroom learning, and academic progress to youth from Chicagos arts impacted communities.
What it reported doing in 2023
ICG Signature Program ICGs Summer 2023 Signature Program offered comprehensive arts-based programming that harnessed STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art, and math) and SEL (social emotional learning) and life skill development through dynamic, collaborative hands-on learning experiences. This high school-based program builds on the learning and skills youth have gained through involvement in ICGs community partnership programs. Over the course of the program participants learn the core life skills needed to help prepare them for the job market or higher education. Students will also be involved in personal-development activities and receive mentoring to learn the business principles of finance, marketing, and sales.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 91% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 60.7%; rating input score 61
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -194.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 60.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.