Ignite Youth Mentoring

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273629555
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Richland, WA, USA
Phone
5099483143
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Child Matching Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$116,360
Expenses
$175,169
Assets
$31,572
Liabilities
$6,493

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN INMAN (President)
  • JOHN SCHELINE (Executive Director)
  • TROY FARLEY (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • DIANA BROWN (Board Member)
  • ROBERT METZGER (Board Member)
  • JOHN INMAN (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ignite Youth Mentoring is a faith-based organization that works to match young people in the Tri-Cities area with adults who act as mentors.

What it reported doing in 2017

Ignite Youth Mentoring continues to work with local schools, churches and businesses to train and recruit mentors, and identify youth who would benefit from a mentor.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -50.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $180K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.