Ignite Sports and Arts Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994236121
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
4073945036
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$111,808
Expenses
$94,918
Assets
$17,890
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tim Grandstaff (Founder and President)
  • Jeremy Chad Harper (Executive Director)
  • Derk Adkins (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Tim Grandstaff (Founder and President)
  • Jeremy Chad Harper (Executive Director)
  • Derk Adkins (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

As a 501c3 non-profit Ignite Orlando exists to create spaces where sport and art meets purpose and the next generation is set on fire for what they love

What it reported doing in 2025

Ignite Sports Arts provided sports camps clinics leagues and athletic development opportunities for children students and families throughout the year Programs focused on skill development mentorship teamwork leadership and community engagement through organized sports activities and events serving approximately 1200 individuals

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.4%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 50%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 196.5% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 178.8% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.4% of revenue deployed · 50% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $47K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.