Iglesia Cristiana Casa De Misericordia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881145765
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Omaha, NE, USA
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,223
- Expenses
- $55,080
- Assets
- $2,914
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Elvia Sheardown (President)
- Carlos Valencia Torres (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Elvia Sheardown (President)
- Carlos Valencia Torres (Vice President)
- Maria Ramirez (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
501c3 Church Organization.
What it reported doing in 2025
Iglesia Cristiana Casa De Misericordia Is a church located in Omaha Nebraska with about 90 members and growing including children we have 15 voluntaries that are focused on the spreading The Word of God to everybody in need. We have three services a week Mondays we have our prayer services where about 30 people assist on Thursdays we have our familiar services where about 50 people assist and we have our services on Sundays where about 90 people assist at this time.To whole this services Iglesia Cristiana Casa De Misericordia is renting a building located at 3217 Leavenworth Street Omaha Nebraska 68105 for the monthly price of $2,200 and $1,500 in cleaning and utilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.4%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 93.3%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 55.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 61.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.4% of revenue deployed · 93.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $51K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.