Iglesia Bautista Hispana Tabernaculo De La Fe
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204538292
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- New Port Richey, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7272647405
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,631
- Expenses
- $52,319
- Assets
- $420,201
- Liabilities
- $203,614
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALCIDES CACERES (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ALCIDES CACERES (PRESIDENT): $10,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Th corporation shall be religious, benevolent, and educational, and as such it shall have all the powers incident to corporations of such character. The specific religious object of the church to the promotion, teaching, and furthering the gospel of jesus christ as set forth in the bible and is perpetuate an organization of christians, self governing as to all actions and proceedings.
What it reported doing in 2016
Life way Sunday school materials
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 3
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 16
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 2.7%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 3
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.6%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 2.7% of revenue deployed · 2.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $11K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.