Ifred Kathryn Goetzke

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201427003
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
7343556716
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Disorders

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,572
Expenses
$16,036
Assets
$13,040
Liabilities
$89,035

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHRYN GOETZKE (PRESIDENT, T)

People named in this filing

  • TOM DEAN (CHAIRMAN)
  • KATHRYN GOETZKE (PRESIDENT, T)
  • DR JOHN GROHOL (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ifred's mission is to shine a light on hope, a known protective factor for anxiety and depression, to end the stigma associated with the disease through prevention, education and research.

What it reported doing in 2023

Ifred continues to present at conferences on mental health. Kathryn goetzke, ifred founder, is now a representative at the united nations for the world federation for mental health. She is an active advocate working to ensure branding around mental health focuses on leadership engagement, celebrity stories, the biology of the brain and body, positive imagery, and the success rate of treatment. Kathryn hosted an event advocating for an international day of hope, the first monday in may, and is working to ensure all celebrate around the world.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 64.7%; rating input score 65

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -187.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.83; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 64.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.