IEM Student Exchange Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842735296
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
6198572499
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,578
Expenses
$142,819
Assets
$152,413
Liabilities
$128,380

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kieu Vo (President)

People named in this filing

  • Kieu Vo (President)
  • Diana Nguyen (Secretary)
  • Ronald M Sahmel (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

International Education Management Group, Inc. (IEM) is a US-based company dedicated to promoting global education by entering into lasting partnerships with internationally focused academic institutions. Through these strategic partnerships and collaboration, IEM provides students with access to different sectors of education from four-year high school to graduate degree programs.IEMs collaboration with partner institutions goes beyond student recruitment. Our partnership structure also includes comprehensive enrollment and on-campus support services to address the educational, social and cultural needs of newly admitted international students.At IEM, we believe that our success is defined by the success of our partner institutions and students. Our support, commitment and passion for this shared success is at the heart of our mission.

What it reported doing in 2024

Encourage and promote international education through partnerships with recruitment agents around the world to provide education and degree programs to students of all backgrounds.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -816.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.84; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -66.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -50% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.