Iec Western Reserve Chapter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341830815
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Youngstown, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3306299810
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,135
- Expenses
- $190,185
- Assets
- $335,583
- Liabilities
- $48,435
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHANE WONNER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN MICK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHANE WONNER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN MICK (PRESIDENT)
- GLORIA AEY (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organization's mission is to train electrical apprentices in order for them to achieve beneficial and safe employment. Organization's purpose is: to promote the common business interests of those engaged in the merit shop electrical construction industry. To promote a high standard within the electrical trade. To promote the common business interests of those engaged in the electrical construction industry. To cooperate with industries, organizations, and government bodies. To encourage and foster safe working practices and conditions for the electrical construction industry. To afford dues consideration to and expression of opinion upon questions affecting the industry and the financial, commercial and industrial interest of the area, and to promote the common business of the industry.
What it reported doing in 2025
Apprentices are trained properly to help them achieve beneficial and safe employment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.76; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.