Idyllic Cat & Dog Sanctuary

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
134205589
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Jefferson, NH, USA
Phone
6035867733
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,802
Expenses
$29,121
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TOULA GUILFOYLE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TOULA GUILFOYLE (PRESIDENT)
  • JANIS GEORGE (CONTRACTOR)
  • SHAINA DAMM (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To emphasize no killing or euthanizing of cats, dogs, pets and other animals under extreme circumstances when determined by the most highly-qualified veterinary professionals to be in the best interest of the animal. Spaying, neutering and providing medical servies to cats, dogs, pets and other animals in conformance with the highest veterinary standards regardless of the owner's ability to pay and without regard to whether the animal is homeless and/or abandoned. A goal of bringing together cats, dogs and other pets with dedicated owners who will adopt them into a loving and respectful home environment. The establishment of a lost & found center for coordination of information and reuniting of cats, dogs and other pets with their rightful owners.

What it reported doing in 2016

Provided cat neuter/spay services for animals. Povided low cost veterinary services for numerous pets.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.7%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -30.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.