Idyll Dandy Arts
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621602342
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Dowelltown, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8285151270
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- LGBT Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,528
- Expenses
- $47,533
- Assets
- $375,435
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIANNA JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRIANNA JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- CATHERINE EARL GREY (SECRETARY)
- SARA BAHERMEZ (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We steward and encourage a world within a world, where ideas and marginalized lgbtq+ people can flourish; to build upon the traditions of survival organizing that have kept our intersecting communities afloat through difficult times. Using consensus process and horizontal organizing, we govern ourselves with a focus on autonomy. We seek to catalogue and share our learning, within the organization and with interested parties seeking to do similar work. We seek to unburden poor people of the responsibility to fund these endeavors through outreach to benefactors, while retaining our anti-capitalist drive. We remain mindful of our ecological impact. The vast majority of ida land has not been and will not be deforested. Ida stewards model sustainability and communal living. We prioritize education with other people in our extended community about how to exist with land, people, and ideas in different ways by empowering people to skillshare with us. Sharing the wisdoms and technologies that
What it reported doing in 2021
We steward and encourage a world within a world, where ideas and marginalized lgbtq+ people can flourish; to build upon the traditions of survival organizing that have kept our intersecting communities afloat through difficult times. Using consensus process and horizontal organizing, we govern ourselves with a focus on autonomy. We seek to catalogue and share our learning, within the organization and with interested parties seeking to do similar work. We seek to unburden poor people of the responsibility to fund these endeavors through outreach to benefactors, while retaining our anti-capitalist drive. We remain mindful of our ecological impact. The vast majority of ida land has not been and will not be deforested. Ida stewards model sustainability and communal living. We prioritize education with other people in our extended community about how to exist with land, people, and ideas in different ways by empowering people to skillshare with us. Sharing the wisdoms and technologies that we've learned from our own experiences at ida is among our top directives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -72.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.9; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.