Idlewild Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825124145
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Hillsborough, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6502557444
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,435
- Expenses
- $114,535
- Assets
- $109,575
- Liabilities
- $3,241
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gene D'Ovidio (President)
People named in this filing
- Ron Lynch (Treasurer)
- Gene D'Ovidio (President)
- John Stricklin (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Idlewild Inc. provides the opportunity for personal contact and interaction between its members, their guests, and others who attend events. The members are bound together by a common fellowship. Idlewild Inc. seeks an environment where members and their guests can freely exchange ideas and information. Our purpose is to support and promote the social gatherings for our membership through personal, leisure, and recreational activities. Our members are bound by the common objective of fellowship and recreational activities which are similar to other social clubs. Our goal is to promote music and intellectual thought among our members and their guests; a place to gather and enjoy meals while discussing a variety of topics surrounding humanities, including literature, theater, music, and art.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025 we were able to hold several events which fostered association and discussion amongst the attendees. We had a few lunches that included conversation and created entertainment. The attendees included 12 members and approximately 25 guests.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.