Identity Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
522120012
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Phone
3019635900
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
AIDS

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,242,318
Expenses
$18,646,798
Assets
$19,592,255
Liabilities
$1,413,368

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DIEGO URIBURU (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DIEGO URIBURU (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $281,806 total reported compensation
  • ANGELA JAMESON (DIRECTOR - FINANCE & OPERATIONS): $173,593 total reported compensation
  • NORA MORALES (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $156,805 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Identity creates opportunities for youth, families and communities with the most need to realize their highest potential and thrive.

What it reported doing in 2024

At school, in the community, and on playing fields, identity not only keeps young people engaged in their education, older youth in their work skills development and parents and other caring adults equipped to help them, but also provides emotional support programs, lifesaving safety net services and compassionate human connection to stave off hunger, homelessness and despair in the most vulnerable youth and families. We work with more than 10,000 clients a year, benefiting approximately 45,000+ residents of montgomery county, md.identity helps youth, and the families who love them, improve social and emotional skills, achieve academic success and prepare for work. Identity assists students, older youth and families with programming in elementary, middle and high schools and through six high school-based wellness centers, two youth opportunity centers and virtually across montgomery county. Identity programs and services are research-based and rigorously evaluated. Identity youth report significant improvements in their ability to resolve conflict, speak up for themselves, manage difficult emotions, avoid substance use and delinquent behavior and (re) connect to school and/or the workforce. Identity youth show improvements in expectations for a positive future and in the social and emotional skills necessary for academic success. Their families report improved communication and more involvement in their child's education. Programs and services are complemented by family case management, workforce development, mental health and substance abuse counseling, non-clinical emotional support, and recreation. We also work to empower parents to engage in their child's education and be a champion for their success. Identity's three largest program services by expenses are case management, high school-based wellness centers, and youth opportunity centers.identity's case management program provides youth and families in need with essential resources to stabilize their basic needs and help them achieve self-sufficiency. This year, more than 6,300 youth and families received over 24,000 safety-net services either directly or by referral, with 93% of all referrals successfully completed.identity manages six high school-based wellness centers that combine individual and group-based social and emotional supports with access to medical care and serve as hubs for programs and services rooted in the positive youth development model to strengthen school connectedness and protective factors that have been shown to lead to better academic and life outcomes. This year, the wellness centers served 3,070 youth and their families (reflecting 25% of the overall student populations in those schools) with curriculum-based programs, non-clinical emotional support, counseling, case management, therapeutic recreation and other enriching activities.identity manages montgomery county's upcounty and downcounty youth opportunity centers. The yocs emphasize building social and emotional and job readiness skills to help vulnerable older youth (re) connect to the education system, the workforce, their families and the community. This year, the yocs served 559 clients with individual mentoring, counseling, ged and esl classes, safety-net supports and workforce development including career pathways and industry-recognized certifications. Through the yocs we also work with eight bridge to wellness high schools to provide positive youth development programs and services that increase protective factors shown to help students connect to their peers, school and education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 84% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $31.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $282K · 24 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.