Idaho State Grange

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820131465
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Meridian, ID, USA
Phone
2088884495
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$85,388
Expenses
$80,881
Assets
$882,934
Liabilities
$3,715

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DIANNE HOLBART (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALYCE EILEEN JAVAUX (MASTER/presiden): $13,333 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The grange is a family fraternal organization dedicated to developing strong leadership, promoting agriculture and encouraging participation in legislative issues and community events.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Idaho state grange deaf awareness program supports the deaf community by making grangers aware of the difficulties that the deaf community face. The deaf awareness program also donates to the Idaho school for the deaf and blind. The Idaho state grange family activities program supports the family unit by teaching grangers different activities that a family can do together to promote strong family ties. The Idaho state granges other program services help to promote agriculture, develop strong leadership issues, as well as involvement in community events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 14
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 15.6%; rating input score 16
  • Program expense ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 16
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.92; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 15.6% of revenue deployed · 16.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 16 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $13K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.