Idaho Society of Ophthalmology Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274161002
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Boise, ID, USA
Phone
2083447888
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$147,376
Expenses
$165,401
Assets
$58,132
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SARA BEATTIE VIA ID MED ASSOC (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • BRENT BETTS MD (PRESIDENT)
  • CAROLINE VARGASON MD (PRESIDENT ELECT/SECRETARY)
  • NATHAN WELCH MD (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SARA BEATTIE VIA ID MED ASSOC (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • BRENT BETTS MD (PRESIDENT)
  • CAROLINE VARGASON MD (PRESIDENT ELECT/SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Idaho society of ophthalmology (iso) is the only state society representing Idaho's ophthalmologists and their patients. As an affiliate of the american academy of ophthalmology (aao), iso is dedicated to educating the public about eye health care issues, advocating for ophthalmologists before the Idaho state legislature and other regulatory bodies, and providing ophthalmologists and their staff with high quality continuing medical education programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Offered education and public awareness about eye health care issues and provided a forum for the exchange of ideas among ophthalmologists in the state of Idaho.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 91% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.1%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.2%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.1% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.