Idaho Partners for Good
Legal name: Idaho Partners for Good Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844361085
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Boise, ID, US
- Phone
- (208) 391-5389
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $195,108
- Expenses
- $111,314
- Assets
- $198,536
- Liabilities
- $15,639
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BLOSSOM JOHNSTON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BLOSSOM JOHNSTON (PRESIDENT)
- BILL RAUER (CO-CHAIR)
- BRANDI BORK (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We exist to develop stronger, healthier, better equipped nonprofits so they can do more of what they do best.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other programs - the nonprofit success lab is a monthly professional development program designed to strengthen the leadership and governance capacity of Idaho's nonprofit organizations. Executive directors, board members, and emerging leaders participate in facilitated sessions to enhance their management skills, align organizational strategy, and improve overall effectiveness. This ongoing training series builds stronger, more resilient organizations that are better equipped to serve their communities. The program was supported through volunteer and in-kind professional services. No direct expenses were incurred in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.2%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.9%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 54.2% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.