Idaho Parents Unlimited Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820395402
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boise, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2083425884
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $768,242
- Expenses
- $716,316
- Assets
- $528,610
- Liabilities
- $289,166
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jacob H Naylor (Vice President)
- Jennifer Johnson (President)
- Angela Lindig (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Alisha Staten (Director)
- Natalie Donohoo (Director)
- Jamie Deaton (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Idaho Parents Unlimited, Inc.; Supports, Empowers, Educates, and Advocates, to enhance the quality of life for Idahoans with disabilities and their Families
What it reported doing in 2024
As the State Family Voices Affiliate and the Family to Family Health Information Center, IPUL assists families in making informed choices about health care. IPUL provide training, information and resources to families of children with special health care needs. The Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA's) Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), together with its partners, has identified six core outcomes to promote the community-based system of services mandated for all children with special health care needs under Title V, Healthy People 2010, and the President's New Freedom Initiative (NFI) designed to break down barriers to community living for people with disabilities. These outcomes give us a concrete way to measure our progress in making family-centered care a reality. Progress toward the overall goal can be measured using these six critical indicators: Families of children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) partner in decision making at all levels and are satisfied with the services they receive; (Partnering with Providers) Children and youth with special health care needs receive coordinated ongoing comprehensive care within a medical home; (Medical Home) Families of CYSHCN have adequate private and/or public insurance to pay for the services they need; (Financing) Children are screened early and continuously for special health care needs; (Early Screening - EPSDT) Community-based services for children and youth with special health care needs are organized so families can use them easily; (Navigating Community Services) Youth with special health care needs receive the services necessary to make transitions to all aspects of adult life, including adult health care, work, and independence. (Transition)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.6% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $627K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.