Idaho Mens E Usssa Cup Team Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873154837
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Boise, ID, USA
Phone
3036389288
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,777
Expenses
$64,210
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID KAUFMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID KAUFMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • JAIME CALLEN KAUFMAN (SECRETARY)
  • VERONICA KISER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support the fundraising efforts of the Idaho men's e usssa challenge cup team. The objective and goal is to alleviate as many expenditures as possible caused by traveling to this annual tournament for the players selected to attend and represent Idaho in the usssa annual tournament.

What it reported doing in 2024

For fy 2023 - 2024 we were able to provide the majority of the funds needed for expenses incurred for the team's travel, meal and lodging to attend the annual usssa tournament in viera west, Florida. We provided 100% of the lodging costs, 95% of the local transportation costs and 50% of the food costs for the trip for the nineteen players, coaches and scorekeeper. In addition, we provided each player and coach full uniforms, and provided professional photography at the tournament. Prior to the tournament we made arrangements for and provided weekly practice facilities as well as special team building activities for not only team members and coaches but for their families as well. We also helped financially support other class teams in their efforts to participate in the men's/women's challenge cup activities

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.6%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 37.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.