Idaho Foster and Adoptive Parent Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263724607
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Blackfoot, ID, USA
Phone
2085696298
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$670,541
Expenses
$316,283
Assets
$439,107
Liabilities
$1,257

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jacque Burt (President)
  • Denise Clark (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jacque Burt (President): $20,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Idaho Foster and Adoptive Parent Association IDFAPA, assists Foster children and youth aging out of Foster Care and provides needed clothing and goods to the foster children especially during an immediate placement when the Foster parents have not received necessary assistance from the State of Idaho. The Village run by IDFAPA provides new and used clothing, shoes, hygiene items, bedding, new car seats, new cribs, toys, books and school supplies and birthday gifts for Foster and Adoptive children. The Village provided all Christmas Gifts to over370 children in Southeast Idaho. The Village has expanded to Northern Idaho and is also providing these items in the Boise and Coeur d'Alene Idaho.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Family Resource and Training Center / Resource Peer Mentor program supported foster parent recruitment, retention, mentorship, and training. Resource Peer Mentors and supervisors assisted foster families, supported new foster-parent training, helped connect families with resources, and strengthened foster care placement stability. The program was funded through Eastern Washington University pass-through support for Idaho foster recruitment and retention services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 65% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.8%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 98.7%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.8%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 69.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 69.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.8% of revenue deployed · 98.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $312K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.