Ican House Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300575616
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Winstonsalem, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3367230050
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Autism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $279,100
- Expenses
- $320,325
- Assets
- $17,634
- Liabilities
- $35,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY SHUFRAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY SHUFRAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $61,180 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
With a foundation in positive thinking, ican house seeks to enhance the lives of those with social challenges by teaching social skills, providing educational opportunities, maintaining a hub for local resources, and providing a support network for those in need.this is accomplished by (1) using a club-based model and a unique, engaging curriculum through which over 110 participants learn and practice concrete social and life skills. Although no diagnosis is required to attend programs, many participants may have social anxiety, adhd, autism spectrum disorder, asperger's spectrum, or struggle with other conditions limiting full realization of their potential; (2)offering individual coaching and mentoring; (3) creating an environment of belonging for members, parents and families. Everything we do is steeped in positivity: to seek and act upon positive choices in the midst of challenges.
What it reported doing in 2024
One-to-one coaching - individualized coaching tailored specifically for children and adults with social and developmental needs, aimed at helping them gain direct instruction in the areas in which they need the most attention. In addition, ican house offers individual coaching for the parents to help them sort through the complex issues that they face. Real world humanities - courses designed as a practical investigation into the confusing social world, aimed at young adults interested in improving the social and life skills necessary for leading happy and independent adult lives. Other programs include overnight trips and day trips.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 75.9%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.98; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 75.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $243K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $61K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.