Icak Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
481113419
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Grant City, MO, USA
Phone
9055475393
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Science and Technology N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,245
Expenses
$72,133
Assets
$208,600
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Dr Genvieve Gagne DC DIBAK (IC Chair)
  • Dr John Millett BSc DC (IC Treasurer)
  • Dr Eric Pierotti DC DIBAK (Vice Chair of IC and Australasia Chapter Delegate)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The ICAK is an international organization dedicated to the advancement of Applied Kinesiology, a system of functional medicine utilizing the manual muscle test to aid in the evaluation of dysfunction in the body and arrive at a diagnosis. How this is achieved will be discussed later in this return.

What it reported doing in 2025

International Board of Examiners program expenses for holding certification exams at annual meeting

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.8%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 3

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -40.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.89; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 42.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 35.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.8% of revenue deployed · 2.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 25 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.