Iam2 Partners Inc C/o Dan Bowling

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454069464
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Eden Prairie, MN, USA
Phone
9525628752
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6
Expenses
$18,337
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAN BOWLING (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAN BOWLING (PRESIDENT)
  • GARRETT MOORE (SECRETARY)
  • BEN BOWLING (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Iam2 partners, inc. Is an organization that exists to empower other 501 (c)(3) exemptorganizations to serve the poor of the world while bringing donors together to be a part of the process. Further, with the intent to bring a sense of collectiveness topeople by simplistically allowing our partners to be a part of theprocess of helping other non-profits by raising funds and awareness on those other non-profits' behalf so they can go help thepoor of the world by more effectively living out their mission statements.

What it reported doing in 2023

Iam2.org employs the collective power of social networks to give individuals and corporations simple, interactive, and viral way to change their world.we focus food, water and protection for children.driven by 3 core beliefs:1. People want to do good and don't know how2. People want to be apart of a larger story3. For were created for good works

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -305,516.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -52.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -42.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.