Iac-international Academy of Consciousness Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200491485
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Pico Rivera, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5626521445
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,531
- Expenses
- $88,525
- Assets
- $126,619
- Liabilities
- $1,096
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IRENE ESQUIVEL (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- IRENE ESQUIVEL (PRESIDENT)
- NANCI TRIVELLATO (BOARD MEMBER)
- WAGNER ALEGRETTI (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide assistance by clarifying the multidimensional nature of the consciousness and all the implications associated with this reality. Iac stimulates expanded awareness by offering and disseminating pragmatic information, employing logic, discernment and the highest principles of cosmoethics. The academy's work is founded on updated scientific precepts and it aims to further human knowledge according to the consciential paradigm. The academy conducts formal scientific research and facilitates advanced multidimensional self-experimentation. It endorses self-critique and encourages individuals to verify the multidimensional nature of existence by themselves.
What it reported doing in 2024
Cdp - consciousness development program: a 20-25 hour instructional program focusing on self-development. The program includes both a theoretical and practical component as well as q&a and follow-up sessions. The program is offered in a recorded format as well as a live online and in-person event.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 70%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67% of revenue deployed · 70% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $62K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.