Hyman Brand Hebrew Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 486125262
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Overland Park, KS, United States
- Phone
- (913) 327-8150
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Primary, Elementary Schools
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,980,710
- Expenses
- $5,980,498
- Assets
- $14,249,587
- Liabilities
- $369,654
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL LEVINE (PRESIDENT (2024))
- DAVID SLUSKY (VICE PRESIDENT (2024))
- DAVID SOSLAND (PAST PRESIDENT (2024))
Highest reported compensation
- ADAM TILOVE (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $257,402 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As a diverse community, united through our shared traditions, culture, & the values of the Torah, we strive to cultivate a generation of Jewish independent & ethical thinkers, determined to reach their greatest potential & have a positive impact on our people & the world. Our Vision "A place of joy” is a phrase we often hear used to describe HBHA – from students, parents, and teachers – and we would like to share that experience with you. For almost 60 years, HBHA has served as a cornerstone of Jewish education in the Greater Kansas City Area, fostering a joy-filled, nurturing, and inclusive environment where students grow into their best selves. As the only K-12 Jewish day school in the region, HBHA proudly welcomes families of all affiliations and backgrounds—from interfaith to Orthodox—providing a remarkable dual-curriculum education rooted in strong academics, individualized...
What it reported doing in 2024
The academy's objective is to provide an excellent, integrated program of challenging academics and moral, ethical, and jewish spiritual values which enable students to successfully enter college and become valuable members of a global society.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 81% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.8%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 69.7%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.38; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 69.8% of revenue deployed · 69.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $257K · 20 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.