Hygiea Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274593276
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
San Dimas, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,512
Expenses
$1,806
Assets
$3,706
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hygiea, inc. Is a non-profit corporation committed to bridging the rifts between those in need and a higher quality of life. We provide information about community services to the general public and create avenues of access for those services. Hygiea, inc. Will be dba as "within reach" and has filed a fictitious business name statement in los angeles county with dean c. Logan, los angeles county clerk dated oct. Oct. 2, 2012.

What it reported doing in 2012

Hygiea, inc. Has spent the year growing the overall organization and has not had the need to create separate prorams at this time. The first activity that hygiea, inc. Has been engaged in was the development of its website and web applications. The expenses for this activity were software, host server fees and web content licenses. The overall cost of this activity in 2012 was 426. The second activity during 2012 was a re-branding of hygiea, inc. To within reach for greater public reception and relevancy within the field of social services. The expenses involved in this were licenses and fees for the dba change totaling 209. The final activity hygiea, inc. Engaged in during 2012 was the setup of office and expenses for basic operation. Expenses involved in this were office supplies and hardware, bank fees, p.o. Box and fundraising. The total for this activity was 1,171.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 67.2%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.05; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.