Hyde Park Refugee Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931884712
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7732896763
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,963
- Expenses
- $89,006
- Assets
- $160,135
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dorothy Pytel (President)
People named in this filing
- Dorothy Pytel (President)
- Kathleen Ray (Secretary)
- Lawrence Joseph (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The core purpose of the Hyde Park Refugee Project HPRP is to assist refugee families and other immigrants that are seeking to rebuild their lives in our community on the South Side of Chicago.
What it reported doing in 2024
Summer Day Camp - HPRP offers a free summer day camp for children from refugee families and other immigrant families in our community. The camp is distinctive in offering relationship-based programming to address language gaps and cultural isolation. It is designed to enhance their sense of belonging in their new community, as well as to help them sustain educational progress made during the school year. In 2024, HPRP held a 4-week summer camp for English language learners. More than 60 children (ages 5-12) participated. Activities included art lessons, music & dance, sports & games, science experiments, reading groups, math tutoring, and educational field trips.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 49% for direct work, and 51% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.1%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.6%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.8; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 52.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 51.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.1% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $67K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.