Huron Station Playhouse Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991849512
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8478301340
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,287
- Expenses
- $41,390
- Assets
- $201,437
- Liabilities
- $183,540
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Alden Ehrenreich (President)
People named in this filing
- Alden Ehrenreich (President)
- Julie Cohn (Treasurer)
- Benjamin Kram (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Huron Station Playhouse's mission is to champion new voices in theater and film, and provide education and access to the surrounding area by connecting local artists and students from a historically working-class neighborhood to creative professionals from the highest echelons of the entertainment industry. Through new plays, writing workshops, acting classes and evenings of creative education, we hope to revitalize theater in Los Angeles while providing opportunities to the next generation of writers, actors and filmmakers.
What it reported doing in 2024
Huron Young Adult Education Programming: HSP served 23 young adults in the community. In our "Youth Acting Class", the inaugural acting class consisted of 20 15-20 year old students. The class ran for 10 days (4 hours per day) with students preparing scenes from contemporary plays for the final free performance for friends, family and 3 industry professionals who provided constructive feedback. The cost of the program was $100 per student, with 4 students receiving full scholarships and 3 more receiving a partial scholarship. The goal of the program was to provide students with a high quality summer acting education program without a financialbarrier to entry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 53%; rating input score 53
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.2%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.87; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.91; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 37% of revenue deployed · 53% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.