Huron Rowing Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383551525
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Phone
7349942045
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,608
Expenses
$160,037
Assets
$70,095
Liabilities
$2,917

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRISTIN SCHRADER (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER HAWES (CO-TREASURER & VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KRISTIN SCHRADER (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER HAWES (CO-TREASURER & VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • CHERI LANTZ (CO-TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and promote the rowing program at ann arbor huron high school

What it reported doing in 2024

The huron rowing association provided assistance and support to the men's & women's crew teams of ann arbor huron high school in the form of equipment acquisition and maintenance, regatta entry fees, food & transportation. For the fall 2024 season, we supported 61 rowers and 6 part-time coaches. The combined team participated in 5 regattas and a select group of athletes rowed at the head of the charles regatta. For the spring 2025 season, we supported 60 rowers and 5 part-time coaches. The team competed in 6 major regattas including the midwest scholastic rowing association championship regatta & state championship regatta. Select qualified boats also participated in the sraa nationals regatta.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.7%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.2% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $151K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.