Hurdle Jumpers

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204446629
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3109684123
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$6,229
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANET R HALBERT (PRESIDENT/CEO)

People named in this filing

  • JANET R HALBERT (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • ROBERT M KLEIN (CFO/TREASURER)
  • NATALIE STANGER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support for cancer patients, to educate cancer patients, their families and the general public regarding support of cancer patients, and to advocate for the betterment of cancer patients.

What it reported doing in 2019

Since inception cancer kits and support has been provided to more than 4500 cancer patients and their families, 7 supplied in 2019. Consumer health companies no longer donate samples of their over-the-counter products to patients, nationally recognized medical experts have volunteered to serve on the organization's health care advisory board, and many high school students have received community service credit for volunteering.in 2011, hurdle jumpers trademark application was approved by the u.s. Patent & trademark office. In 2017, the trademark was renewed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -70.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -51.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.